Employer guideRead at source, 3 September 2026

New Hire Forms Checklist: Every Federal and State Form Required in the First Week

The federal list is short and everybody knows it: I-9, W-4, a new hire report, E-Verify where it applies. The state layer is where checklists go wrong, because it is three separate questions and almost nobody puts them on one page. Thirty-eight jurisdictions publish their own withholding certificate, but four income-tax states use the federal W-4 and four more treat their form as optional. Nineteen states plus DC require a written wage notice at hire, and two of those obligations are new since 1 January 2026. And direct deposit cannot be made a condition of employment in sixteen jurisdictions, a list circulating on vendor sites with no citations and at least two states missing. Everything below was read at the state revenue department, the state labor department or the statute on 3 September 2026.

The federal layer, and the only deadline that is genuinely hard

Five federal items, one real clock. The Form I-9 is the one with teeth: Section 1 by the employee first day of work, and Section 2 within three business days of the start date. Everything else is either governed by your payroll cycle or by a state deadline. This page deliberately does not restate the I-9 rules, the E-Verify thresholds or the new-hire reporting deadlines, because each has a page of its own here with the statute attached, and duplicating them would only mean two versions to keep current.

Three details from the IRS hiring page, read at source on 3 September 2026, that repeatedly catch people. If a new employee does not give you a completed W-4, withhold as if the employee is single rather than waiting. A W-4 stays in effect until replaced, and when a replacement arrives you have until the first payroll period ending on or after the thirtieth day from receipt. And an ITIN is not acceptable in place of a Social Security number for employee identification or for work, which is worth knowing before somebody in payroll accepts one.

The four pages that carry the detail: Form I-9 requirements for the three-day rule, the current edition and the penalty bands; E-Verify requirements by state for who is mandated and at what headcount, which is a definition rather than a number in several states; new hire reporting requirements for the twenty day federal ceiling and the nine states that run faster; and new hire orientation for what happens after the forms are signed.

The state layer is three questions, not one

Ask a payroll vendor for the state new hire forms and you will get a withholding certificate. That is one third of the answer. The three questions are: which certificate, is a written wage notice owed, and may you require direct deposit. They do not correlate with each other and they do not correlate with whether the state has an income tax.

The withholding certificate. Forty-one states and DC have an income tax, and thirty-eight of those jurisdictions publish their own certificate. But four income-tax states have no state form at all and use the federal W-4: New Mexico, where you annotate the federal form; North Dakota; Utah; and Pennsylvania, which has a flat rate and no allowances. Four more have a form that is not universally required: Colorado DR 0004 says on its face that it is optional, Vermont recommends W-4VT rather than requiring it, New York IT-2104 is a fallback, and Kentucky K-4 is only needed to claim exemption or extra withholding. Delaware is the awkward one: a pre-2020 federal W-4 may be accepted, a 2020 or later one may not. Mississippi and Wisconsin say plainly that the federal form will not do.

The wage notice. Nineteen states plus DC require a written statement to the new hire, but they split into two very different obligations. Most are short — rate of pay, payday, place of payment — and can often be satisfied by a posting. Five are not: California, New York, Minnesota, Rhode Island and DC require a long itemised notice, and four of those require a signed acknowledgment you have to keep. New York requires it in the employee primary language with an affirmation that they identified that language correctly, and a six year retention.

Compiled 3 September 2026 from state revenue departments, state labor departments and statutes. Direct deposit rows marked not verified are ones we could not trace to a primary source; the widely circulated vendor list is uncited and we are not repeating it. Michigan is frequently listed as a wage notice state on a citation we could not substantiate, so it is shown without one.

Two obligations that are new since 1 January 2026

Both took effect this year and both are missing from most checklists, because the checklists were written before them.

Rhode Island now requires a wage notice at the start of employment under R.I. Gen. Laws 28-14-12, added by chapters 337 and 338 of the 2025 public laws and effective 1 January 2026. It closely tracks Minnesota: nine items, including the rate and basis of pay, meal and lodging allowances, the policy on sick, vacation and personal leave, employment status and whether the role is exempt from minimum wage or overtime, the deductions that may be made, the days in the pay period and the payday of the first payment, the legal and operating names, the address and the phone number. The employer must keep a copy signed by the employee. Unlike New York, the statute is English only.

The District of Columbia expanded its notice on the same date. Under D.C. Code 32-1008(a) the hire notice must now also list the sources of compensation beyond base wages and gratuities: bonuses, sales commissions, any amount calculated as a percentage of service charges, and anything else. If your DC notice was drafted before this year, it is short a section.

Direct deposit is not yours to require in sixteen jurisdictions

This is the row most likely to be wrong in your onboarding pack, and the one where the vendor content is worst. The same twelve-state list circulates verbatim across payroll sites with no citations attached, and it is both incomplete and missing the two clearest statutes in the country. Arizona says a person may not be denied employment, discharged or reprimanded for refusing to consent to payment by deposit. Florida says no employer shall terminate anyone solely for refusing to authorise direct deposit. Both are in statute and both are easy to check.

We verified sixteen jurisdictions that bar making direct deposit a condition of employment: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Vermont and Virginia. Utah sits on its own: an employee may refuse in writing unless the employer federal employment tax deposits exceeded $250,000 last year and two thirds of staff are already paid electronically. New York has the other notable exception, for executive, administrative or professional employees earning more than $1,300 a week.

Nine states verifiably allow you to require it, all with conditions: Iowa only for employees hired on or after 1 July 2005, Massachusetts only if the employer does not choose the institution, Michigan only with a written choice form and thirty days notice, Texas only with sixty days advance written notice and only for employees who have suitable accounts, and Washington only where it imposes no cost on the employee. For the remaining states we could not verify a rule from a primary source, so the table says so. On a topic this heavily farmed by content sites, an honest blank is worth more than a confident guess.

Frequently asked questions